ClassicSounds.pl

A miser will pay twice

In a sense that is certain we had been fortunate to have St. Petersburg Mostotrest one of the primary consumers while they handle an operation that is day-by-day of. Furthermore, Mr. Y. Petrov, whom had previously been the manager of Mostotrest at that moment and an excellent expert and “patriot” of the Northern Capital bridges, demanded fr om us to ensure to begin with a long-term solution dependability associated with the bridges. Besides, he constantly emphasised that people reside and operate in St. Petersburg, and for that reason we now have no right to create ugly bridges or even to design simply a typical framework. The vector of development which he has designated for Stroyproekt nearly fully complied with your very own perceptions and choices. But, the genuine situation with Russian road industry into the 90-es could not expedite the job! Russian construction laws and SNIP norms (that are being currently upd ated) are dated returning to 60-es and 70-es if the engineering ideology ended up being primarily dedicated to materials saving. The efficiency that is economic the fundamental requirements for design assessment plus some Russian developers still follow through this approach. In comparison to this, we constantly strived to accomplish a structure that is reliable supplying for logical usage of metal and concrete.

St. Petersburg bridges demonstrably illustrate the huge difference of the two design approaches. Among the list of Neva River bridges which is why a reconstruction has been produced by us design, Troitsky and Dvortsovy Bridges withstood about a century without major repairs. Besides, their elements that are structural remained in reasonable condition and needed just some fix not replacement. To the contrary, the Lieutenant Schmidt Bridge (or Blagoveshchensky Bridge), that has been recently reconstructed based on our design, has quite an unusual fate. The bridge could stay about sixty years only after it was reconstructed in 1936 – 1939 according to the design by Academician G. Peredery. The Volodarsky Bridge integrated 1936 in accordance with G. Peredery design could endure also less without the repairs: it absolutely was reconstructed in 1986 – 1993.

Within our time, we had been taught to adhere to the example up of G. Peredery, whom becoming an apologist of constructivism thought the greater rational was the greater amount of beautiful. Besides, this concept had been therefore jealously utilized in the late Soviet period that currently the Peredery’s arches in Volodarsky Bridge of 1936 appearance a whole lot more appealing compared to the current facade regarding the bridge that is same. But, the training shows that axioms of this connection dependability and durability don't contradict the sweetness concept. In the– that is 60-es they relegated the visual element of the backdrop while pursuing the effectiveness and nearly ignored bridge architectural aspects. During party regarding the company’s twentieth anniversary this season we had been extremely pleased to learn fr om certainly one of our visitors that people had found a brand new connection design approach since any connection created by our business had its specific “face”. In reality, this isn't an innovative new but when generally speaking accepted and soon after forgotten approach. When making we ought to always remember that the general public do value an appearance that is visual of as well as other road works. Or even an expert, you would not manage to gauge the structural design effectiveness you could constantly notice if the framework is breathtaking or perhaps not. Consequently, we se t up a group that is architectural the business at the beginning of our professional tasks.

Dispute about composite strengthened concrete

So during our first separate jobs, partially in accordance with Mostotrest demands and to some degree in accordance with your individual thinking we already designed to replace the current approaches. The very first task where we had been assigned to end up being the General Designer ended up being a little connection within the Slavyanka River at 676 kilometer of Moscow – St. Petersburg engine road (1995–1996). We now have proposed a brand new design concept of composite decks for tiny bridges that included a cast-in-situ slab and versatile studs manufactured from rebar metal. Regrettably, not absolutely all the solutions because of this bridge were realized, nevertheless later on in 1997–1998 our concept had been implemented for rehabilitation associated with the connection throughout the Saimaa Canal when you look at the populous town of Vyborg.

Bridge building in Soviet Russia had been commonly centered on basic utilization of precast beams for little spans. Carriage way slab joints was once a point of this type of structure week. Whenever into the last half of this 90-es Stroyproekt had been included into connection inspection, design and direction when it comes to Russian Bridges Rehabilitation Program of Overseas Bank for Reconstruction and developing, we'd an opportunity to see with your very very own eyes the condition that is terrible bridges had been. Simply for some thirty several years of procedure the bridges manufactured from precast beams got totally away from purchase! And they certainly were the absolute most bridge that is myasianbride.net/latin-brides/ common. Consequently, we started initially to seek out an alternate to precast beams that will guarantee durability that is structural. At that amount of time in Russia cast-in-situ tangible started to achieve some appeal which it currently had abroad. In specific, this technology had been utilized for Moscow Ring Road construction. Nonetheless, Moscow national having its capabilities that are financial something, therefore the sleep of Russia was different things. For Russian contractors cast-in-situ reinforced concrete structures had been uncommon and inconvenient, they needed equipment that is new work training and as a consequence their construction ended up being higher priced generally speaking. For decades our connection builders had used to precast structures that have been prefabricated at plant and erected at spot. We understood that cast-in-situ reinforced concrete would hardly ever become extensive in Russia and an alternative was found by us which was really obvious as it had recently been mentioned in publications of N. Streletsky, V. Bystrov, etc.

We began utilizing composite reinforced concrete for little spans

You could not really dream from it through the Soviet times: metal had been a critical material needed for defense industry and its own usage ended up being strictly limited. In connection building, metal ended up being used just for over 60m long spans. This restriction ceased to occur just in 90-es so we began trying: first in the Slavyanka River Project and in the future at Saimaa Canal.

Desperate to abandon precast slabs and also to begin to use slabs that are cast-in-situ we now have considered complete jobs as a good example. An issue with studs needed to be resolved. Soviet studs that are rigid broke slabs (and beams aswell) making them non-durable. Today versatile Nelson studs are widely used. And also for the connection over Saimaa Canal we were able to implement an appealing innovation of o. Bakhurin, a professional of Scientific analysis Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete. He proposed a special welding device for ribbed club welding. Rebars could possibly be welded using this device at spot, that was less costly. Unfortuitously, Bakhurin welding device (Gefest) had not been accepted for mass-production and after this contractors need to buy foreign-made Nelson studs and international welding devices for them. a strength that is high ended up being useful for the Saimaa Canal Bridge along with flexible studs made from reinforcement metal in leave-in-place formwork. This reasonably small task became a starting place for further professional growth of the business including elaboration of y our very very very own design practices. Although we'd made our choice, ideological disputes whether composite reinforced concrete ended up being suitable for brief spans proceeded for the number of years.

Whenever back 1999 Stroyproekt ended up being developing the style for St. Petersburg Ring path interchange with Primorsky roadway near Gorskaya railway section, we utilized composite structures not merely for the overpass that is main additionally for curved ramps of 60 m radius. It absolutely was an innovation too since curved beams were considered to be tough to produce. Nevertheless, our solution had been effectively realised and soon after it when designing the Ring Road facilities on we have often used. During those times construction associated with Ring Road that were anticipated because of the town for way too long had simply started, and we also attempted to result in the Gorskaya interchange architecturally effortless recognisable. We had been not necessary to do this; it had been our personal initiative. White ?-shaped (or trapezoid) pylons entrance that is imitating made this big structure look light and stylistically complete. This interchange exposed in 2001 became an icon of a brand new phase regarding the Northern Capital transportation development which had started with all the Ring path construction.